INTA34/ 10-24 REPORT



METROPOLIS NOW?

World Urban Development Council @ INTA 34 World Congress, San Sebastian 





INTRODUCTION 

The Council is a unique vehicle for exploring urban futures, facilitated by INTA. This year’s Council in San Sebastian brought together practitioners, academics, government officials, corporations and investors from around the world – Western Europe, Iran, Peru, Columbia, Taiwan, Japan and elsewhere. 




SUMMARY 

- Together we face the challenge of accelerating change and instantaneous communication, although the impact may be manifested differently in societies and places throughout the world. 

- Past concepts of an idealised ‘utopia’ and old rule books are no longer relevant as management tools today. 

- Rather than be shaped and driven by change we should seek to be proactive and positively shape change and thus deliver transformation. 

- The new ‘guidebook’ won’t be a universal solution, a detailed master plan or a rigid ‘sat nav’ with a ‘one size fits all’ approach. It will anticipate trends, present fresh perspectives and foster innovation in technology,design, governance, planning tools and financial systems that will help us to continuously adjust, manage and adapt. We will apply and tailor these perspectives to our own circumstances, resources and cultures. 

- People must be central to all we do. ‘Nothing about us, without us, is for us.’ The greatest legacy we can leave future generations is that of genuine engagement, equity, inclusion and promotion of diversity. 

- Using and developing technology is essential but as a means to make better more efficient places and better societies rather than an end it itself 

- New models of sustainability should reflect a range of territorial perspectives including the city in the metropolis, the city in the region, and in particular urban - rural relationships that respect the dignity of urban and rural poor. 


NEXT STEPS 

INTA provides the vehicle to take forward this exploration of urban futures through its Objective 2030: what future for sustainable urban development? 

INTA will engage its members in rethinking the urban development process, in introducing a fresh perspective on the major drivers of change that will shape future sustainable policies, in setting up ‘clusters of competence’ that will explore specific policy aspects and in validating the solutions they propose through a series of international roundtable discussions. INTA panels will seek to apply the principles that emerge to specific places and problems. 


THE DEBATE 

Henry Chabert began by reflecting on the past desire for ‘Utopia’, the ideal city. Whilst never delivered, the search did help address specific issues at certain times. We now face a challenge of a greater scale – that of the Metropolis. 



Michel Sudarskis intorduced a perspective on the emerging Metropolis: 

- a new generation of problems including security, eco-efficiency, disappearance of agriculture, cultural mutation and an aging population 

- a new technological wave with a new economy is emerging driven by IT and a new urbanism of production, raising questions about our identity and roots 

- more intelligent development processes involving public private partnerships, management and governance tools yet requiring trust and solidarity 

- sustainability that must integrate social, physical and economic aspects 

- the Metropolis of Citizens requires dialogue, democracy in cities ‘for all’ 

- the integration of the urban area into its region 

- the search for high quality living with promotion of public spaces 

- the Metropolis in the region and in the world 

- the Metropolis of its time with accelerating change and instantaneous response 


Maurice Charrier reflected on the search for Utopia which began in the Middle Ages as a return to ‘God’s City’ that mankind had perverted. In the 19th century the model focused on social relations and in the last century ideals were driven by technology and science. Today we should return to a focus on people with Utopia based on social relations but drawing on science and technology as a means not an end. 


Joseph Tossavi from Benin reminded us of the ‘utopia of despair’ and called for ‘we the rich people to respect the people who use the city’. Experience from Columbia also highlighted the human aspect – ‘when we see human beings at the centre the discussion is different.’ The challenge of social exclusion was emphasised - in UK some 50% of budgets are spent on social and health issues and these budgets are now subject to severe cuts. 

Others emphasised the importance of the citizen, of building trust between elected representatives and the people they represent. In Benin where cities were less than 100 years old they were seeking to create a new identity as they moved from a colonial past. 

Didier Drummond challenged us to shape a collective vision and to be innovative. We should take inspiration from the ‘utopia written every day in the slums of the world where people without infrastructure or professionals develop models and offer solutions’ he reflected on the accelerating pace of change and the ‘inertia of the instantaneous’. With the acceleration on access to information we were losing our memory and our vision. We must envision shared cities that are inclusive and welcoming. We must write the vision down quickly before we lose our memory and our vision. 


Pedro Ortiz called for a positive response with INTA positioned to write the ‘new manual. It was recognised however that there was no miracle solution, no single solution – each place would find its own response and should mobilise all stakeholders in doing so. So a handbook of universal solutions was not appropriate – rather we should seek to develop our knowledge of tools that could be applied and implemented locally. 


The debate returned to the mobilisation of people and ideas and of building trust between people and the elected members. Pedro Ortiz reminded us of the 230 countries with 70% of the world’s population that are not part of G20. Who is speaking for them? What project is there for that level? Can INTA contribute to filling this gap with a vision and benchmarking to guide development? 

The major role of technology was considered. Technology changes quickly, cultures slowly. Whilst the Copenhagen conference couldn’t agree global roles, cities were now moving forward. Existing technologies could achieve significant energy savings and be cost effective, Green solutions were advocated that would lead to economic growth. More balanced cities would promote better infrastructure investment, renewable energy and recycling. 

From a private sector perspective Martijn Kanters highlighted the increasing mismatch between supply and demand. From his experience across Western Europe loose planning systems could lead to loss of control and urban sprawl but too strong planning led to mismatches between demand and supply. Cities are accommodators of demand and as this demand becomes more sophisticated so the supply side must respond through more flexible and adaptable governance systems. Suggested tools to be used could include better uses of public spaces, more flexible governance, using taxes to redistribute assets and surpluses and creating leverage. We need to consider the relationship between cities and regions. 

Lawrence Barth described how architecture was a way of thinking not just of creating a style. We needed to find instruments to move forward in a fresh way and with fresh understanding. We needed to explore new workspaces and consider the synthesis between inclusivity, job creation and the integration of technologies into neighbourhoods. INTA should draw on the lessons of current large integrated projects in Singapore and elsewhere that are being defined around a future based on integrated solutions and where new ways of planning are emerging. Cities had a role to play in communicating fresh actions and thinking. 

We were reminded again of the disparities between poverty and modernity found in many large developing cities between beautiful old towns and modern concrete commercial areas, the problems arising from pollution, waste, bad health, traffic chaos and insecurity. Lima’s population has risen from one million to nine million in sixty years. Power and riches are found side by side with poverty and ill health. 

This provoked further consideration of the plight of rural areas and the linkage between urban and rural issues. Joe Montgomery questioned whether the urban model was suited to secure the dignity of people of the urban poor. Should INTA widen its agenda to consider how we can develop sustainable rural areas? 

It was agreed that we need both universal and local solutions. In relation to technology there was a paradigm shift – in future energy supplies would be dependent on both central sources and a smarter decentralised grid into which locally produced energy would feed. 


Michel Sudarskis drew the discussion to a close by emphasising the need for: 

- People to be central and at the core of the debate 

- New territorial frameworks including rural/urban and city/region relationships. 

- Conceptual change with fresh perspectives 

- Redefinition of partnerships between public and private sectors 

- Identification of relevant governance and management tools




Report done by Kyle Alexander (Strategic Investment Board, Belfast, UK)
Board Member of INTA

No hay comentarios:

CONTENIDOS

#BancosAtocha #Churruca15 #cities4youth #createdestruct #DebatesUrbanos #DigitalMX #EgiaMapa #InnovaciónCiudadana #Meetcommons #OlotMésB #OpenUrbanLab #P2PWikiSprint #PiensaSol #SEMGetxo #SmartcitizensCC #UrbanCommerce #Wikilovesmonuments 15M A Coruña AC Etsam Accesibilidad Activando Espacios Ada Colau Advocacy Planning Agora2015DSS Agricultura Agrupaciones de Arquitectos Urbanistas Airbnb Alcalá de Guadaíra Alcalá de Henares Alcobendas Aldea Digital Alfafar Alimentación Alquiler social Amasté Ambilly Análisis Análisis Urbano Andar Andrés Walliser Aprendizaje Aprendizaje colectivo Aragón Aranjuez Arganzuela Arquia Arquitectura Arquitectura Bioclimática Arquitectura social Arquitecturas Colectivas Arte Arte Urbano ASA Assemble Astra Gernika Asturias Attac Autobarrios Autoconstrucción Autogestión Autonomía Autourbanismo Auzoetxe Baleares Barcelona Basurama BAT Bernardo Gutiérrez Bernardo Secchi Bicicleta BiciMAD BID Bien común Bienal de Paisaje Rural Big Data Bilbao Blog Boa Mistura Bottom up Brasil Buen Vivir Burbuja Inmobiliaria Burgos C4C Cambio climático Cambio de época Camiños Seguros Canalejas Cañada Real CarpeVia Cartagena Cartas de Navegación Urbana CARTO Cartografías y Mapas Casa de Campo Castilla La Mancha Cataluña Cazorla CENTAC CentroCentro Circe City Making Cityfollowers Ciudad Ciudad 2.0 Ciudad Deseada Ciudad Discreta Ciudad Marca Ciudad Paramétrica Ciudad sensible Ciudad Sostenible Ciudadanía digital Ciudades Emocionales Ciutat Orgànica Club de Debates Urbanos COAM Cocreación Código Abierto Codiseño Cogestión Cohesión Social Cohousing ColaBoraBora Colectivos Colombia Comandante Tom Comercio Común Conama CONAMA 2012 Concursos Condiciones Metropolitanas Contemporáneas Conectividad Conferencias Congresos Contaminación Cooperación Internacional CooperaGava Copyleft Córdoba LUZe Covivienda Creando Redes Creatividad Social Crisis Crónicas Crowdfunding CSOA La Morada Cultura Cultura Libre Cumpleaños en el bloque Cunctatio Cursos y formación Daniel Ferrer DataViz Debates Democracia Desarrollo Urbano Sostenible Descargas Desigualdad Destrucción Creativa Diagnóstico Diamantina Dinamización económica Diseño Diseño Colaborativo Diseño Urbano Diversificación DIY DMH2013 Do It Yourself Documentos Domenico di Siena Donostia DOT_Euskadi DPR Barcelona Ecología Ecología Urbana Economía Economía social Ecuador Edificio España Edificios públicos vacíos Eduardo Mangada Eduardo Serrano Educación Educación Expandida EDUSI EDUSIOlot EDUSIZGZ Edward Soja Eficiencia energética Eginbook El campo de la cebada El Escorial El Paseo de Jane Empoderamiento Empresa English Entorno Natural Entrevistas EQUIciuDAD Ergosfera Erin Johnson Espacio Espacio Comunitario Espacio Público ESPACIOS Espacios de batalla Espalet España Especulación Estados Unidos Estudio Ethel Baraona ETSAM Europa European Green Capital 2012 Euskadi Euskara Eva Morales Eventos Expediciones Experiencias Exposiciones Extremadura Fab Lab Fabricación digital Federico Soriano Financiación colectiva Fluxus Fotografía Francesco Careri Francia FRAVM Fuencarral-El Pardo Fuenlabrada Galicia Gavà GBCe Gehl Architects Género Gentrificación Geografía Georges Perec Gestión Comunitaria Getxo Girona Glocal Gobernanza Graffiti Graffitiaccion GTR Guadalmedina Habitabilidad básica Habitat Hábitat III Habitat3 hACERIA Hangout HarineraZGZ Hécate Hécate Ingenieria Herramientas Digitales Hipotecas Hiria Kolektiboa Holanda Huertos urbanos Huesca Iberoamérica Ibiza ICC Iconoclasistas Idensitat IGOP Imagina un Bulevar Improvistos Increasis Indicadores Indicadores Participativos Infraestructuras Innovación Ciudadana innovación social Innovación Urbana InPar Institucionalización INTA Inteligencia Ciudadana Inteligencia Colectiva Interdepartamentalidad Intermediae Internet Investigación Irekia Isabel Martin Ruíz Izaskun Chinchilla Jane Jacobs Javier Burón Javier Puldain Jazar Joan Subirats Jordi Borja Jornadas Jornet Llop Pastor José Fariña José María Ezquiaga José María Romero Juanma Murua Juego Jueves de Churruca Julián Salas La Casa Invisible La Liminal Laboratorios Ciudadanos Laboratorios Ciudadanos Abiertos Laboratorios Urbanos Abiertos lacasinegra Lacol LAG_Euskadi Las Rozas Las Vegas Latinoamérica Lavapiés Lecturas Demoscópicas Lefevbre Left Hand Rotation León 11 Locales comerciales vacíos Logística Los Madriles Los Pirineos LOTP-CLM Lurraldea2040 LurraldeBizia Madrid Madrid Think Tank Málaga Malasaña Manu Fernández Manuela Carmena Mapeo colectivo Mappe Marea Verde Marina Blázquez Mario Gaviria Matadero Madrid MCAS Medialab-Prado Medio Ambiente Mercado de Legazpi Metodología Metodología DCP México Mi Ciudad AC2 Microurbanismo Mientras tanto Miguel Jaenicke MiraQueLindo Miriam García Montenoso Movilidad Movilidad urbana sostenible Mujeres Multidisciplinaridad Murcia n´UNDO Nación Rotonda Naciones Unidas Náquera Naquerant Espais Negociación Urbana Nociones Comunes Noticias Nueva Agenda Urbana Nueva York Observatorio Panamericano Ocio Okupación Olot Ontinyent ONU Open Data Open Government Open Source Opensource OPPTA Orba Ordenación del territorio Ordenanzas Oviedo P2P Paco Gómez Paco González PAH Paisaje Paisaje Transversal Paisaje Urbano Papers57 París Parque Regional ParqueJH Participación Ciudadana Participación Digital Pasear Paseos Ciudadanos Paseos-Fuencarral Patio Maravillas Patrimonio Peatón PECAM Pedagogía Urbana Pedro Bravo Periferia Perspectiva integral Perú Peter Hall Philadelphia PIAM Piensa Madrid PIER Pierobon Pinto PintoPlanCiudad PKMN Placemaking Planeamiento urbano Planes de Barrio Planes estratégicos PlanHUCA Planur-e PLAYday PNU Políticas Urbanas POLURB 2015 Porfolio Postmetrópolis PPS Premio Privatizaciones Procesos de Negociación Urbana Procesos Participativos Procomún Producción Psicología Ambiental PTP-Bilbao Publicaciones Puente de Vallecas Puerta del Sol Punt Sis Quito Rafael Mata Ramiro Aznar Ramón López de Lucio Reactivación comercial Reciclaje Recife Red de Espacios Ciudadanos Red Viaria Redes Referencias Reflexiones Regeneración Urbana Rehabilitación Rehabitat Renovación Integral Resiliencia Revitalización Comercial Revolución Urbana Rio Grande Rio Grande o diamante da cidade Rivas Vaciamadrid Rural Rusia Salud urbana Sant Miquel Sao Paulo Saskia Sassen SEGIB Segovia Seguridad Sentient city Seres Urbanos Sevilla SIG Sigüenza Sindicato de Arquitectos Sinergia Sostenible Sistemas de Información Geográfica Sito Veracuz Smart cities Smartcitizens SmartcitizensMX SmartZGZ Sociología Sostenibilidad Sprawl Stakeholders State of Power Stepienybarno Stop Depredación Storify Streaming Superilles Tabakalera Taller de Casquería Talleres Talleres de trabajo Tecnalia TED Tenerife Terrazas Territorio Tetuán Think Cities Think Commons TIC Todo por la Praxis Toledo Torrelodones Traficantes de Sueños Transdisciplinariedad TRANSFORMINGMADRID Tránsit Triball Trujillo Turismo Turismo Sostenible Turismofobia Turistificación TXT Espacio Público UEM UIMP undoestudio Unió de Cooperadors Universidad Universidad Complutense de Madrid Universidad Europea de Madrid UPM UPV URBACT Urban Sustainable Development Urbana URBANBAT Urbania ZH Urbanismo Urbanismo Adaptativo Urbanismo Emergente Urbanismo Inclusivo Urbanismo P2P Urbanismo participativo Urbanismo social Urbanismo Táctico URJC Vacíos Urbanos Valencia Valladolid VdB Vecinos VIC Vídeos Villaverde Virgen de Begoña Visualización de datos Vitoria-Gasteiz Vivienda Viviendas vacías Vulnerabilidad WebPT Wikimedia Wikisprint WSB14 Zaida Muxí Zaragoza Zaragoza Open City 2020 Zaramari ZAWP Zinc Shower Zuloark ZZZINC


Este blog funciona bajo una licencia Creative Commons Reconomiento-NoComercial 3.0
Desarrollado con Blogger por Paisaje Transversal